Skip to main content

Can EA save the world?


Nowadays we have developed the most complex society humanity has ever known. And we have maintained it up to this point. But technological innovation evolves like any other aspect of complexity: the investments in research and development grow increasingly complex and reach diminishing returns. That is the point where the level of profits - or benefits - gained is less than the amount of money or energy invested .

Therefore, we cannot expect continue forever to spend more and more on technological innovation when we’ve reached the point of diminishing returns. This is why Joseph Tainter, author of the book “The Collapse of Complex Societies ” argues that our system of innovation is going to change very significantly over the next decades. By the end of the century, it will not be anything like what we know today. It will have to change deeply. And it’s likely that innovation is not going to be able to solve our problems as readily as it has done to this point.

The technological optimists, and IT is plenty of them, have assumed that the productivity of innovation is either constant or increasing. In fact it is actually decreasing: IT systems are becoming more and more complex, therefore expensive to maintain. Every “solution” of today is going to become the legacy system of tomorrow. That means is that we will not forever be able to solve enterprise problems through innovation as we have done in the past 50 years.

Collapse of a society follows from the failure of its problem-solving institutions. Enterprises collapse when their investments in increasing complexity and their energy subsidies reach a point of diminishing marginal returns. From Tainter's perspective, we are likely already past the tipping point towards collapse but just don’t know it yet.

The alternative to collapse is to start to think of the enterprise in term of sustainability and resilience, rather that short term gains and efficiency.

Sustainability requires that enterprises acquire the ability, and the inclination, to think broadly in terms of time and space. In other words, to think broadly in a geographical sense about the world around them, as well as the state of the world as a whole. And also, to think widely in time, in terms of the near and distant future.

This may be a challenge for the current corporate mind set, but the issue is rooted in the structure of our mind.

One of the major problems in sustainability and in this whole question of resources and collapse is that we did not evolve as a species to have this ability to think in systems and processes. Instead, our ancestors- who lived as hunter-gatherers - never confronted any challenges that required them to think beyond their locality and the near term.

So our species did not evolve to think broadly in terms of time and space and if we’re going to maintain our way of life, people have to learn to do so: to think extensively in terms of processes and systems; to think historically, considering also the long-term consequences of our decisions; to reflect holistically, about what’s going on in the world around us instead of the narrow way – the short sighting, silos way. Enterprise architects, as the role that considers the “big picture” need to take responsibility for broad, long term thinking and for knowing and understanding the predicament that we’re facing.

Comments

Anonymous said…
luckyclub.live - Lucky Club Live Casino
Lucky Club is an online luckyclub casino that offers a wide range of games for you to choose from, so check them out. If you like the live casino
Unknown said…
Wow, amazing block structure! How long
Have you written a blog before? Working on a blog seems easy.
The overview of your website is pretty good, not to mention what it does.
In the content!
vstpatch.net
Pianoteq Pro Crack Crack
Xpand 2 Crack
Acronis Cyber Backup Crack
Plugin Boutique Scaler Crack
Soundtoys Crack
shonafaheem said…
I like your all post. You have done really good work. Thank you for the information you provide, it helped me a lot. I hope to have many more entries or so from you.
https://getprocrack.org/
Plugin Boutique Scaler crack
Haider Khan said…
I am a professional web blogger so visit my website link is given below!To get more information
Plugin Boutique Scaler v Crack/

Popular posts from this blog

TOGAF diagram examples

Foreword This article contains consistent examples of all TOGAF diagrams for the four architectural domains. After many years as a TOGAF practitioner, I have to say that it's a lot that can be improved in the framework, that often remains vague and some time is inconsistent. In the TOGAF specs, some of the metamodel elements  are well described while others are left to our best judgment. The DAF metamodel is a tailored version of the TOGAF one, implemented as UML profile and maintained in Sparx Enterprise Architect.  Those examples are the result of real life use of TOGAF in projects: you may or may not use them for the the sake of the TOGAF certification exams.

Chi Gen: structure of a generator

The ChiGen is a java application that executes specific transformation (cartridges) against a specific metamodel (Chronos). Components Metamodel The metamodel is the model that describes models, in other words it's a collection of the elements that we use in the modelling language. the CHiGen uses the Chronos and Ouranos Metamodels. Xtend Xtend is a functional language, with which it is possible to expand existing types described in the Metamodel with additional logic. The concept is called Extensions (it is also part of the C # 3.0 specification). These extensions can be accessed both within Xtend and in the other family's languages (check and Xpand)  . Furthermore, the concept of  Extensions simplifies the transformation of models in other models (M2M). Check the Check language is considered the be an equivalent of  OCL . Unlike OCL, it's also based on the language family of oAW and can therefore be carried out not only on MOF-compliant models, but also t